Driving while texting (DWT) is becoming a hot-button topic in many states. As of right now, it is still legal to text and talk on a cell phone while driving, but Georgia law enforcement expects a change soon.
Cpl. Mark Chestang of the Richmond County Sheriff’s Office motorcycle division said he sees cell-phone related accidents frequently.
“The bad thing about it is that with the wrecks we work we might know there’s texting or talking involved but a lot of people will say ‘I wasn’t talking’ or ‘I wasn’t texting,’” he explained. “So you’ve got a lot of denial. A lot of people won’t admit it even though you know they were based on what other people tell you.”
As of January 1 there will be 19 states to have outlawed DWT. Chestang explained that many states recognize DWT as similar to DUI. Fines will be comparable to those of a DUI and if injury is involved, the impaired driver may likely see jail time.
Earlier in 2009, Car and Driver magazine conducted a road study that compared DUI driving abilities with DWT driving abilities. The study showed study reaction times of drivers at two different age ranges under three conditions: reading a text, writing a text and while intoxicated. Both drivers’ reaction times were recorded at 35 mph and at 70 mph. The drivers were told to drive a straight line and stop after seeing a light flash on the dashboard.
The 22-year-old driver, according to Car and Driver, took an extra 21 feet to stop when reading at 35 mph and an extra 30 feet to stop at 70 mph. When typing a text, the driver took an extra 16 feet at 35 mph and an extra 31feet at 70 mph. Then when intoxicated, the driver took an extra 7 feet at 35 mph and an extra 15 feet at 70 mph.
The 37-year old driver, according the article, took an extra 188 feet to stop while reading at 35 mph and an extra 129 feet at 70 mph. When typing a message, the driver took an extra 90 feet to stop at 35 mph and an extra 319 feet at 70 mph. Then when intoxicated, the driver took an extra 7 feet at 35 mph and an extra 15 feet at 70 mph.
But DWT and DUIs aren’t the only issues. Chestang said throughout his job as a police officer he has witnessed a number of other dangerous activities that drivers do, such as talking on a phone, reading newspapers and women applying makeup. Radios can also pose a problem, he explained, whether it’s playing music so loud that the driver can’t hear what’s going on around him, changing stations and CDs or dancing.
Just in one week in November, Motor Deputy Dustin Snead saw two overturns that he said he believes were cell-phone related.
“What happened is that (the driver) was on the phone and hit the curb because he wasn’t paying attention,” Snead said. “When he hit the curb he overcorrected and the vehicle went sideways with about 34 feet of side skid before he hit the other curb, rolling the vehicle almost three times before it landed back on its top.”
With the other accident, the driver claimed to have fallen asleep, Snead said, when he went off the road while going around a curve. He overcorrected before clipping a manhole cover, causing the vehicle to flip down an embankment for about 25 feet.
“We’ve all done it,” Chestang explained of DWT. “I can’t sit here and say I haven’t done all of the things I mentioned except for the putting on makeup part. That’s why I know first hand that texting can be dangerous. I, myself, though I hate to admit this, have done it over the years. You’re texting and the next thing you know you’re drifting across the road. You look up and you’re over the yellow line or you’re going off the road a little bit.”
Tiffanie Meador, a junior communications major, could relate when texting cost her around $900 in repairs.
Meador said she was going to pick up a friend from work when she was 19 and texted him to let him know she was on the way. The next thing she knew she had left the roadway.
“I flattened both my right tires, bent both my rims, broke my tire rod and killed the shocks on my car,” she recalled. “It was only a one-car accident but if somebody had been walking beside the road I could probably have hurt someone very badly, if not killed them. I did $900 worth of damage to my car just because I decided that it was important that I text him while I was driving. After that I just kicked myself.”
Now Meador said she does not use her cell phone at all while driving.
“I’m pretty sure I’m one of the few in my generation that feel this way,” she said. “I just think a lot of people don’t care or think ‘You know, I can do what I want to,’ and think ‘I can talk on my phone and nothing’s going to happen. I’m a better driver than that.’ I mean, I certainly thought that. I didn’t think I was going to run my car off the road while I was texting, but I did.”
During November, 400 students from Augusta State University were chosen at random to complete a survey asking about their texting, talking and eating habits while driving. Two hundred and thirty-five students admitted that they text while driving, while 329 admit to talking on their cell phone while driving. Then, 287 admitted to eating while driving. Thirty-nine said they do not text, talk or eat while driving.
Thirty-four students admitted to having been involved in an accident that resulted from cell phone usage.
The survey also asked student to list any other activities they performed while driving. Some of the answers included reading, studying, applying makeup, plucking eyebrows, changing clothes and shoes, holding a dog, using GPS or an iPod, brushing hair, smoking, checking face book statuses, feeding a baby, digging in pocketbook/book bag, balancing a checkbook, shaving, painting nails, using a laptop, knitting, playing video games, drawing and participating in sexual activities.
The Augusta State driving survey was conducted in November with 400 students and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 5 percentage points.
Mark Smith, a freshman criminal justice major, works full-time for both Martinez-Columbia Fire Rescue and Gold Cross Ambulance in Columbia-Richmond County and said he deals with cell-phone related accidents every day. Smith said usually the accidents are minor, but every once in a while he has seen people be airlifted following a cell-phone related accident.
“I had a friend of mine get killed a year and a half ago,” Smith said. “She was sending text messages and crossed the center line head-on into a Tahoe. Usually, it’s just you look away for a second and stuff happens.”
However, Smith said he is also guilty of DWT not only while driving in a vehicle, but also when driving on a motorcycle.
“It’s in the back of your mind what could happen, but at the same time, you just kind of do what you do,” Smith said. “I get on to my sister all the time though. I guess it’s a double standard.”
Even Augusta State’s campus has fallen victim to DWT, according to Jasper Cooke, director of Public Safety. Cooke said he sees a lot of accidents on campus but, like Richmond County, finds it hard to pin down how many are actually cell-phone related.
Once a year, Cooke said Public Safety conducts a seatbelt study at least once every semester, where it tracks the number of students leaving campus between 11a.m. to 1 p.m. (high-traffic hours) who are wearing seatbelts as well as using cell phones.
“For every 10 people that exit campus after 11, almost nine out of 10 are on their phone… and almost nine out of 10 have their seatbelt on. So we see a low number of seatbelt violations, but a high number of cell phone users.”
Meador said as part of her technical writing course she and her group members have been working with Cooke to see what it would take to prohibit the use of cell phones on campus while driving. She has proposed that signs be put up across campus implementing the rule.
However, Cooke said that without it being a Georgia law, the university can not ticket students for using their cell phones unless there is approval from the student government.
Meador said she believes the a law outlawing DWT should be implemented in Georgia in order to increase driver accountability and save lives.
“It’s gotten to a point where we live in this world where (a cell phone) is kind of like an invisible best friend,” she explained. “If you feel uncomfortable out in public by yourself, you’ve got your cell phone there. You can call anybody and be in touch with anyone at any moment. We have this sense of immediacy. Our fix is our cell phones. I think we rely on them too much.”
Chestang said he also foresees a change in Georgia law coming soon and believes it will serve as an effective deterrent to texting drivers.
“I think once we get out there and really start enforcing it and it got known that this is a $500 or $600 fine, it would (deter drivers)…,” Chestang explained. “It’s the same thing as drinking and driving. We know we’re not going to stop it completely but we want to stop enough of it or make them think about it enough that they don’t do it. How hard is it to wait 15 minutes to get to where you’re going to send a text.”
However for those who just can’t wait, there are phone applications designed to solve some of the problems texters say they have.
Drive Safe.ly is an application that reads your text messages out loud in read time and even understands texting shorthand (OMG, LOL, BRB, etc.). For more information, visit www.drivesafe.ly.
Textecution, on the other hand, is a mobile application that disables the sending and receiving of text messages once the phone has reached an excess of 10 mph. For more information, visit www.textecution.com.